| Retrogaming Times Monthly |
| Issue #25 - June 2006 |
|
Table of Contents | |
| 01. | Press Fire to Start |
| 02. | The Many Faces of ... Up 'n Down |
| 03. | ColecoNation |
| 04. | Commodore Corner |
| 05. | The Titles of Tengen |
| 06. | Nintendo Realm |
| 07. | The Thrill of Defeat |
| 08. | Game Over |
Press Fire to Start
by Adam King
Greetings, gamers, and welcome to a "better late than never" edition of RTM. Sorry about the lateness for this issue but my life's been hectic the past few weeks and I've barely had any time to get this sucker done. But here it is so away we go.
| The Many Faces of . . . Up 'n Down |
| by Alan Hewston |
This month we’re back with a full review covering the many, (but mostly hard-to-find) faces of Up ‘N Down. In honor of the Indianapolis 500, I try to review a racing/driving game this time of year – in this case there is not that much high speed action, but hey! – It’s still a driving game. At the arcades, this Bally/Midway game in a Sega cabinet did pretty well back in 1983. The game is a single player (at one time), vertical scrolling driving game with a three-quarters view of a VW Bug (Baja Bugger) which must drive over top of (collect) a complete set of colored flags along various motocross courses. Once all 10 flags are collected, the round is completed and you will move on to a different and more complex/difficult course. Each course has traffic (other motocross racers), turns, intersections and obstacles, but all paths are a single lane wide as they zig-zag up and across the screen. You lose your vehicle if you touch or are touched by any other vehicle, make contact with the obstacles (bridge-out & dead ends), or if you jump and do not land on the roadway. Early on, the game is somewhat forgiving if you are partially off the road as you land. You earn points by moving forward or backwards along the road and for collecting the flags and other bonus items. The faster you complete each round the more bonus points (if any) you can earn.
You tap the
stick forward/back and adjust the speed of your buggy in increments (about 4
speed settings on home versions) going forward or reverse. Tap the direction you
want to go to speed up or slow down and on some versions you can even come to a
complete stop. You’re able to jump only when moving forward, but once airborne,
you can tap the stick quickly and speed up (forward) or down (reverse) but
always moving in a straight line. That is, you cannot make turns when airborne,
but you can defy laws of physics by speeding up or slowing down (thrusters
perhaps). Fortunately when on the roadway, your car steers itself following any
curvature of the course, but always continues straight through intersections.
You can turn/steer when at any intersection both if moving forwards or in
reverse. Likewise the other cars can change directions at intersections and in
some home versions the other cars may change directions as well. When driving on
level ground, your buggy will maintain its present speed (no need to move
joystick) and as appropriate, it will speed up or slow down due to any hills. In
order to maintain your speed when going uphill, you must hold the stick (that
direction you are moving) the entire time going up the hill or you will quickly
lose your speed and then start rolling downhill (making you helpless – ie
defenseless as you cannot jump if moving in reverse). Holding the stick to
maintain speed on hills is necessary regardless if you are going uphill in
forward or reverse.
So . . . you can change your speed and course (turn at intersections), and even move in reverse to change paths and collect all the flags and also seek out bonus items. You must avoid the other cars but the most fun is in jumping and smashing the other cars (ala Bump ‘N Jump) – which does not harm your buggy and you get points for doing so. When you smash another vehicle, it is gone from your view and you continue on driving as if you simply landed on the roadway and they were never there. There is no limit to the number of enemy cars on each course, but the number on screen and their speeds and AI will increase with the rounds. You also must jump and be moving fast enough to clear all hazards when there is a break in the road or bridge out, ort jumping from one lane to another. The other cars cannot jump and do not collect the flags, but in later rounds 1 vehicle will drive around with a flag (possibly a color you want or if not a blank flag). The less time you take to complete each course, the more bonus points you can earn, but if you take too long, you get nothing. At the arcade, Sega’s “Pengo” makes a guest appearance in Up ‘N Down if you complete each of the first 4 rounds in under a minute each. Pengo then appears in the water of round five riding a surf-board – something worth trying to see (on MAME).
![]() |
| Herby says “Not many of these faces are easy to find in the wild”. |
Rumor Mill: Atari 5200 (likely to have been a port/copy of the Atari 800) & Sinclair Spectrum (never came out, but was planned/announced).
Home Version Similarities. Except those in <> all home versions have: a demo mode <AP2 & 2600>; a pause <2600>; a restart <AP2>; a choice of 2 players (not simultaneous) <AP2>; a choice of up to 3 starting rounds <2600, AP2 & CV>; there are several different motocross courses or maps in the sequence, which will then repeat; as you progress, they get more challenging and varying; there are up to 3 <2600 only 2> simultaneous paths seen on-screen at a time; 10 <2600> different flags to collect to complete each round; flags collected change color to become blank once you drive over them <2600>; the flags remaining display area shows all the flags <CV> and colors them in or blanks them once you collect that color; at some point (round 5 or higher) blank flags that are driven over will toggle back on <AP2? & 2600> (to their color – just like Q*bert), meaning you have to drive back over them to complete the round [This sounds so simple - a toggle - but it adds greatly to the difficulty strategy and overall gameplay of this driving/collect-em-up]; there can be more than one flag of each color type on each course, and if so all flags of the same color toggle on/off together; there are 4+ enemy vehicle types; the number of enemy cars is sparse in the first round <AP2, 2600, Atari 8 Bit & CV>; there is a gradual increase in their numbers and speed for the next few rounds <AP2>; enemy cars will drive at different speeds and they can drive both forward (up), or in reverse (down); some enemies can carry a flag <Atari 8 bit? & Ap2?>; the scrolling action up or down is smooth, but the continuity of where vehicles (& some bonus items) are on the course is lost once it is completely off-screen; in general the flags are fixed on each course, but in some versions the flags disappear and/or move about on the course (I did not try to keep track of this or penalize); if you lose a life, your next Buggy always starts at the same starting point on the course, and the flags remain collected (or not) as they were when you crashed; so the final flag or 2 may be located behind you (go backwards) from the starting point; the score, round number and # of lives remaining are displayed on screen; after completing each round, you get a short break in the action <2600> and see a screen displaying you how long you took to complete the course, and the bonus points you can earn with a fast enough race. Nearly all of these faces come with a steep price tag for the cart, so I did not disqualify any of them.
Have Nots: Apple ][ (34)
My first reaction was
that the frustration comes early, often and is multifaceted. It hits you on all
cylinders – being too difficult, having way too many enemy cars, clumsy controls
and then to top it off a terribly slow pace in the action. And then, you cannot
start over, but must wait until the next game begins, which it does
automatically, which is also pretty lame. The Gameplay is of good quality (8)
but could be better if the speed were faster . . . and I could not make it far
enough to determine if the flags toggle or if the other cars can carry flags –
if yes for both of these, then add another point. As is the case with all home
versions, there is quite a lot of depth to this game with the various cars and
speeds, intersections, bridges out and dead end traps, a lot of variety in the
courses, changing speeds, changing directions, collecting items and bonuses,
smashing other cars and having an unseen (no pressure) timer along the way.
Quite a lot going on and the AP2 gets most of it done well. Addictiveness is
decent (6) but as mentioned is so frustrating. The difficulty and lack of a
quick reset really hurts. The usual pause <Esc> is here but there’s no
choice to play a higher skill level or start at a higher round. Graphics are
good enough (6) to play but the details are lacking – making it a little hard to
know where you are, or if you have landed. There is some color variety, graphic
variety, multi-colors, backgrounds and animation, but they are all poor. The
scrolling action is good. The track variety, hills, demo, number of enemy cars,
flags and numeric and flag displays are all good. The Sound is OK (6) but the
music is only present during the title screen and not during gameplay. The
effects are mostly there, but sound a bit tinny (internal speakers). Most
notably missing is the effect for jumping. Controls I scored an (8) as they
suffer partly from the analog controls, and partly from very slow response to
changing speeds. You cannot tap the stick here, but must push all the way up,
then re-center, then push all the way up . . .all very quickly and it really
wears on you . . . over and over. The terrain makes your buggy change speeds
faster than you can control, which is not fair. Also it seems that you cannot
jump again as quickly as you can on the other versions.
Only found on diskette. As is often the case for original disks, they are semi to very hard to find as an original. Thank goodness for pirating to keep this platform alive. Ranting time: Maybe AP][ owners never parted with their collections, or stuff went right to the trash. Ebay dealers want way too much money for original disks. Granted they do not show up in auctions that much, and no surprise that they often get no bids – ie you’re asking too much for them – and they may no longer work. Maybe 99% of all remaining Apple ][ originals are owned by like 100 people total – I dunno, but I’m glad that I’m not looking for Originals any more.
Have Nots: Atari 2600 (36)
My first reaction was
to agree with most reviewers and hate the looks of it, but applaud the effort
and effectiveness of what was achieved. The Gameplay is the worst here, but
still very good (7). Most elements are in place, but a little lacking in depth –
fewer flags, only 2 lanes, not as many dead ends or intersections, and fewer
enemies on-screen. The flags do not blank out when collected, which means there
is probably no toggling of flags in later rounds, but at least in place of these
missing flags, there are added bonus items. A surprising, unique feature is that
the cars will change directions on you. Addictiveness is decent (6) with a
couple choices for difficulty option (easy jump) but not a starting round. There
is no pause and the difficulty is a bit too hard. There’s not quite a demo mode,
but the screen continues to change to show a different portion of the courses. A
nice way to display something unique on the screen, while keeping the TV from
burning in. Graphics are not surprisingly the worst here, (5) mediocre, with
everything blocky and blurry. It’s hard to tell where you are when trying to
turn and gauge the speed increase for each hill. Some cars disappear right in
front of your eyes. There is no animation and all other graphics categories are
poor, save for color variety which is pretty good. Sound is surprisingly crisp
(8) with a terrific musical score that has possibly more duration and variety
than all the other versions. Most of the effects are in place, but most notably
missing is one for jumping. Controls are perfect (10). Obviously this cart is
not worth $65 on the merits of the game alone, but it is collectible.
Silver Medal: Colecovision & Atari 8 bit computer
(42)
Another close race and they both did well enough to medal. If
one could clean up the problems for both silver medalists, they’d both gain on
the C64. I’d probably go with the CV and its screen clarity.
Colecovision (42)
My first reaction was this one could win the gold until I discovered
a big setback to the addictiveness – you can cheat and stand still and score
points and jump while standing still and score more points by crashing enemy
cars all day. Yawn. But hey, you can probably hit 7 figures, and roll it over in
an hour. Gameplay is outstanding (9) with nearly everything in place, save for a
minor deduction for not having the complete set of flags on display. I really
want to see them all at a glance, but a clever (but was it really necessary)
work around to save space on the display is to show 1 flag and have the number
of flags remaining next to it and each of the remaining colors alternates on the
display of this one flag. A bonus life is earned at 25 K and around 60K and
maybe more later. Addictiveness is very fun (7) with a pause <0> and the
above mentioned cheat hurting the replay value here. While there is no start
round option, I gave some credit the choice of 3 difficulty settings. But as is
typical of the CV, the “Easy” setting is plenty hard – so not much help in the
replay value here. Graphics are (7) pretty good with the best clarity and good
scrolling action, good choice of colors, color variety, graphics variety, and
your multi-colored buggy. But the other cars could use more variety, multi-color
and animation. The numeric and flags remaining displays are poor. Sound is
fantastic (9) with a nice in-game musical score and an end of round jingle. The
effects are all in place, plus two unique effects for when the buggy lands and
when going downhill. Nice! Controls just barely scored a (10). The controls
interface could be improved as only the player active can use their “0” to pause
the game. Thus you are forced to use CV controllers - cannot use both a third
party controller and pause. Those hating the CV controls may readily lower the
score to 9. A $40 price tag for the cart means you’ll have a hard time finding
this one, so look for the C64 instead.
Atari 8 bit (42)
My first reaction was they made great efforts to make the
Buggy look good, and 3-D but then forgot to add in color and graphics variety.
The Graphics are exciting (7), but as is often the case, too busy and not so
clear. There is room to improve the animation, multi-color and details. The
Gameplay is impressive (8) but has fewer cars and variety at higher levels than
the other medal winners and no sign of bonus items or a car carrying a flag.
There is no bonus life through 25K, but it may occur higher. Addictiveness is
enjoyable with no setbacks and is the best (8). The difficulty actually starts
you at rounds 1,2 or 3 and your pause is the
Gold Medal: Commodore 64 (44)
My first reaction was
how frustrating this game is, but then after playing the others, this one has a
bit more staying power being among the best in Graphics, Gameplay and Sound.
Gameplay is all there and (9) well-done. Extra life earned around 30 K.
Addictiveness is very fun (8) with an easy first round and gradually increases
in difficulty. The pause is
Final
Notes:
After trying in vane, forcing myself to play game after game and
failing to see if all game elements are in place, I think I am burned out and
like this game less than when I started. I did come to some closure and have a
new outlook. Despite the “race and collect the flags” theme I saw no reason to
do so. In fact due to programming, here’s my top 10 reasons why NOT to follow
that premise.
1)
Smashing other cars earns you points. So Crash cars.
2) Smashing cars earns
you even more points than collecting flags!
3) Smashing cars will help keep
you alive by not colliding with them.
4) A slow diet of Smashing cars is
safer than driving too fast to beat the clock.
5) Smashing cars requires
moving forwards, which earns you points safer than when moving in reverse. So
move forward and smash cars.
6) Smashing cars is even worth more than bonus
items.
7) Smashing cars will always earn you points, whereas the flags will
disappear.
8) A bonus life can be earned if you score enough points so keep
on smashing cars.
9) The round doesn’t get harder if you keep on smashing
cars and avoid flags.
10) Finally, if you complete a round the courses get
harder but you do not earn any more points, so keep crashing cars on round 1
forever.
OK, so now I may have ruined the game for you, but hold on. Since it is not necessary to ever complete a course, yet keep playing, you can probably get your best score, or play forever all on round one. This pretty much makes the score in this game meaningless and hopefully my fellow judges at Twin Galaxies (correct me if I am wrong) will agree that the points scored are not the best indicator of your skill at this game. So forget the high scores and my Top 10 reasons to smash cars. What you really need to do (easier said than done) is to ignore collecting points and just focus on completing as many rounds as possible. The highest round completed means a lot more than a score. Hopefully I will have saved you a lot of trouble and you can now just go out and collect those flags, and conquer each course in a safe and responsible manner. Drive safely! Buckle up. And don’t drink and drive.
Acknowledgements,
Updates and Errata from last month.
Thanks again for help a few years
back from Stephen and Sir Thomas for their floppy disk copies. I’m sure that I
owe someone else thanks for saving one of these rare carts just for me to buy or
trade for.
Come back next month: I’m falling behind and late on my submissions, so I will keep trying every month, but if you don’t see one, then I’ll be back the next month. Look for the many faces of Vanguard for the Atari 2600, 5200 & Atari 8 bit computers. Rumor Mill for the TI-99. Contact Alan at: Hewston95@NOSPAMstratos.net or visit the Many Faces of site: http://my.stratos.net/~hewston95/RT/ManyFacesHome.htm
| ColecoNation |
| by Nathan Kozlowski |
Magical Tree review
With an official release only occurring in Japan in 1985, one would assume that Magical Tree must be one of the rarer games in the MSX library. However, it quickly spread through Europe via imported copies and has since become one of the most popular games for the system. After much anticipation, Opcode's Magical Tree made its ColecoVision debut at this year’s NorthWest Classic Gaming Enthusiasts Expo and now everyone has the chance to see what all the hub-bub’s been about.
In Magical Tree, you are Apache Kid, the youngest, smallest member of the tribe. However, what you lack in stature, you make up in insane jumping skills (we’re talking NBA talent here). Apparently there’s a very big tree in the middle of the forest and rumor has it that a mysterious castle sits at its top. Seeing how everyone else in the tribe was acting like a pansy and refusing to check the tree out, you decide to show them how its done and set off to reach the tree’s top.
The journey up the
tree is divided in to stages and once you reach a new stage’s starting point,
you’ll never fall past it if you were to miss a branch or jump. Falling is the
least of your problems though, since this will not kill you but only set you
back. The real issues are the inhabitants of the tree. Apparently, numerous
animals live in the tree and they don’t take kindly to visitors. Avoiding the
touch of the owls, caterpillars, and cocoons are critical, because they (along
with the occasional lightning bolt) will kill you and take you to the beginning
of your current stage.
Considering the long trek required to reach the top, you’ll be disappointed to learn that you only get three lives. Not to worry, more can be earned by reaching specific point totals. Also, when you eventually use up all your lives, the game allows you to continue at whichever stage you left off. Both are nice features of Magical Tree, because very few will be able to complete the mission without some extra help.
Magical Tree progresses at a nice pace, which adds to the overall enjoyment of the game. While you instinctively want to race up the tree’s branches, no time limit is forcing you to do this and you tend to be rewarded more for climbing the tree at a slow and cautious speed. The more points you earn the more lives you will be rewarded with, so take your time and get the treasures and gems that are found in every stage. Also, make a point to knock the owl out with an acorn. It’s not a required action, but it’ll give you some points and, more importantly, it’s fun to do.
It’s the game’s humorous side that really makes it fun to play. Most of these touches are subtle and inconsequential to gameplay, but all make this game truly unique. The owl-hunting with the acorns is one example, but essentially everything Apache Kid does adds amusement to the challenge. Everything from his little dance after every stage to his facial expressions when he’s hanging from a branch are all nice touches that give the kid a personality that the player is able to relate to. It’s also difficult to get frustrated when you die or take a big fall, since the kid’s humorous expressions during these events lessen the gravity of the situation.
Magical Tree has many strong points, but
monotony is its one weakness. The detail and vibrancy of the game’s graphics are
some of the console's best, however the music gets old fairly quick. The sound
effects are solid; it’s just that the short-looped melody adds more distraction
than enjoyment. No complaints can be found with the gameplay, the flexibility of
control and movements (jump, climb, and hang) enable you to effectively take on
the game's challenges. Unfortunately, the diversity of obstacles is limited and
the length of your journey is quite long. Climbing is great, but after a while
you wish that both the course and the enemies would change up a bit.
Magical Tree is another solid game from Eduardo Mello, with gameplay and graphics that make it a standout in the ColecoVision library. Not only is the game fun to play, but it has qualities that appeal to a larger audience. It offers a challenge that is difficult enough for the classic gamer, but approachable to those who normally shy away from the intensity found in your average arcade game. Make your hippy neighbor proud and do some tree-hugging of your own with Magical Tree.
Be sure to check out www.ColecoNation.com for the latest issue and more great ColecoVision articles.
| Commodore Corner |
| by Brett Brunell |
This month is another review of another Commodore 64 classic! I will be reviewing a great sequel, Pitstop II!
Pitstop II (copyright © 1984 Epyx)
![]() |
![]() |
| The title screen | The options screen |
*** DESCRIPTION ***
Pitstop II is basically one of the best Formula 1 racing games ever made. What sets this game apart from other Commodore 64 titles is its two player component. Two players can play the game simultaneously! When you consider that this game was made in 1984, you have to wonder how they did it. It was definitely a game ahead of it’s time!

The Racing Action!!
*** SCORING ***
Misc: 7/10 – Unfortunately, this game takes forever to load. Multiple levels of difficulty, numerous tracks, and great AI give this game overall thumbs up!
Graphics: 9/10 - The graphics are amazing for 1984. Epyx mixed the 16 color palette quite nicely on this one. Six tracks are also available. This game makes you say “What’s Pole Position?”
Sound: 7/10 – As always, the sound in this Epyx game is on or above par. Semi-realistic tire squeals and engine revs.
Playability: 10/10 - Playability is where this game shines. The various difficulty levels make this game fun in one player mode, but for a real treat, grab a friend and play head to head.
Originality: 6/10 – This game is basically a rip off of Turbo, Pole Position, and Enduro but with some nice extras like pit stops, tire changes, and running out of fuel.
Overall: 39/50 – Just an awesome game all around. If you don’t have this in your C=64 collection, get it! I just wish they would have made a Pitstop III!
*** MISCELLANEOUS ***
Brett Burnell is a programmer/analyst for Donegal Insurance in Marietta, Pennsylvania. In his free time he can be seen programming video games, being a referee for Twin Galaxies, going to Retrogaming shows, or just playing with his kids. He can be reached at b2ksolutions@verizon.net.
| The Titles of Tengen - Gauntlet |
| by David Lundin, Jr. |
We've reached the end of the line, only one NES Tengen game that saw the light of day is left to be looked at - that game is Gauntlet. In one of the most obvious home conversions Tengen could have decided upon, and one of the first unlicensed NES games ever, this arcade masterpiece was headed to living rooms across the nation. In the arcades of the mid 1980's Gauntlet was a smash hit. Featuring an overhead view of vast and complex dungeons filled with enemies and puzzles, there were few other games that received the same 'round the clock play. Up to four players could adventure together, leaving and joining the quest at any time. Take the role of Thor the Warrior, Thydra the Valkyrie, Merlin the Wizard, or Questor the Elf on an endless adventure through the Gauntlet. Even though the levels would become increasingly more complex and enemy infested, the goal remained the same: to survive and find the exit to the next stage.
Some compromises had to be made when converting the game over to the NES hardware. Of course the first being the limitation of only having two controller ports which cut the number of simultaneous players in half. However Tengen got clever and worked the limitation into the backstory, explaining that the portal into the Gauntlet would only allow the passage of two mortals, forcing two of the warriors to remain behind. Even though only two can play at the same time, all four characters are selectable. The basic abilities of each character carry over nicely onto the NES - Thor is strong but slow, Thydra is well balanced, Merlin has weak defense but strong magic, and Questor is very fast but is also very weak. The next change is how health is given to your character. In the arcade each credit gave its respective character 700 additional units of health, this meant as long as you kept plunking coinage into the machine, you would live forever. The NES version starts each character out with a specific base amount of health. As treasures are collected the maximum amount of heath increases, starting at the first 50 treasures, then 100, then 200, and so forth doubling each time. While this makes searching out every last bit of treasure far more important than in the arcade version it also makes the game much more difficult since every little hit and wasted step adds up.

Instead of simply replicating the stages of the arcade and having no central goal to the game, the NES version paints a fantasy backstory of the warriors setting off on a quest to retrieve the Sacred Orb. Morak the Evil One has imprisoned the Sacred Orb in the lowest level of his Gauntlet, guarded by the fearsome Guardian. There are one hundred individual rooms in five worlds which must be conquered in order to reach the Guardian and gain the Sacred Orb. However it's not that easy, many rooms have multiple exits that will turn you around and send you back and forth between already completed areas. Additionally to gain the Sacred Orb you must find your way into the eight clue rooms and uncover the special combination that will release the Sacred Orb to you at the end of the game. If this sounds like a lot of bother - it is. This huge fetch quest makes the overly complex ending stages of the Tengen port of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom look like a cake walk. There is a password feature but it will only return you to the last treasure room you completed. Yet with these changes the core of the game is still in tact.
The enemies are faithfully recreated, keys still have to be found to open doors, enemy generators still need to be destroyed to keep from being overwhelmed, the health meter constantly ticks down and survival is paramount. It just doesn't look anywhere as good as it did in the arcade but the graphics are more than passable. Nearly all the audio effects from the arcade are missing however that's to be expected as arcade Gauntlet had hundreds of digital sound effects and voice clips. Instead a few nice dungeon crawling tunes play in the background however they don't seem to be stage specific. It may all be there but it goes sour quick for one reason and one reason alone. Gauntlet in the arcade was a game of frenzied action and quick strategy. The NES version is riddled with slowdown that causes horrible control lag which leads to missed shots and death. Half of the time you will constantly be killing enemies to keep their numbers down just so the game will get back to a somewhat stable frame rate. It is because of this glaring problem that the game goes from being a vast challenge to an exercise in frustration. Additionally player characters move slower diagonally than they do vertically or horizontally which is blatantly unfaithful to the arcade version. Once the limited health is tacked on top of that and not being able to add extra credits for health at any time, the game simply quits being fun. It's a shame since if the frame rate was more stable this would be an awesome adventure game for the NES.
What you're left with is a game that's a lot of fun through the first dozen stages but after that the technical limitations begin to appear which causes the entertainment factor to disappear. Tengen gave gamers more with the NES version of Gauntlet but maybe they offered up a little too much. Simply put, it's far too ambitious a task for someone that enjoyed Gauntlet in the arcade. Much in the same way as with Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom later on, Tengen simply drifted too far away from the arcade formula and ended up giving the player overwhelming choices in what should have been an action arcade game. Just the same both a licensed and unlicensed version were released with only the usual copyright screen changes. In the end Gauntlet on the NES is a strange enigma. A game I want so desperately to just sit down with for hours and fight my way to the end, yet after getting half way through world three things have gotten so frustrating that I simply give up. There's so much potential there but it never comes to fruition.
"InsaneDavid" also runs a slowly growing gaming site at http://www.classicplastic.net/dvgi.
| Nintendo Realm |
| by Scott Jacobi |
Another month, another 8 Famicom games, only three of which made it to the United States in some form. This selection of games starts out with a bunch of great arcade ports, but ends with two luke warm titles. Never the less, I will cover them to give you an idea of what sort of titles came out in Japan that should have made it to America, and which titles were rightfully excluded from localization. No Famicom editorial this month, let’s go straight to the games.
Hyper
Olympics, released by Konami on June 21, 1985. Released as the first half of
Track & Field in the US on April 1987
If you were ever in an arcade
from 1983 to roughly 1985, you are probably familiar with this game. Track &
Field was a very unusual title from the sports genre of games. For controls, it
employed just three buttons; left foot, right foot, and jump/throw. Novice
players and experts alike could be seen mashing on the left and right buttons as
rapidly as they could in order to break the “Olympic records” stored by the
game. The arcade version contained 6 events. When the game was translated to the
Famicom, two of them, the hammer throw and the high jump, were removed to leave
room for the 100m dash, long jump, 110m hurdles, and javelin throw events.
Konami even released a special controller called the Hyper Shot to use with this
game, and it’s sequel, Hyper Sports, that merged the left and right run buttons
to a single button. Konami had developed the practice of dividing the events
across several releases with multiple iterations of Hyper Olympics and Hyper
Sports on the MSX computer (which also received the Hyper Shot controller.) When
Konami brought this game over to the United States (and Europe,) they merge the
two Famicom games together and released it with the American name of Track &
Field, which is actually a combination of events from the original Track &
Field and the arcade sequel Hyper Sports. Track & Field had a profound
effect on the home gaming market, influencing game play styles of several
multiple event games such as Activision’s Decathlon and Epyx’s Summer Games.
Star
Force, released by Hudson on June 25, 1985. Released by Tecmo in the US on
November 1987
Star Force was originally an arcade game developed in 1984
by Tehkan, which later changed it’s name to Tecmo. By today’s standards, it
would be labeled as a run of the mill vertical shooter. For it’s time, it was
rather well made, and the port to the Famicom was handled very well by Hudson.
(Hudson originally ported the game to the MSX, whose scrolling capabilities were
less than stellar, see Gradius.) The game is not remarkable, but it is fun to
try. Your ship scrolls upward through space, occasionally flying over isolated
islands of land where you can shoot buildings and uncover bonus items. Flying
opponents appear fairly constantly in predictable patterns, some harder to avoid
than others. Occasionally a powerup appears in the form of a tiny version of
your ship. Upon collecting it, you are rewarded with rapid fire until death.
Mid-bosses appear in the form of a ship that comes together from four directions
partway through the level, and the boss appears as an object on it’s own deck
surrounded by cannons, which scroll off and disappear shortly after the boss
appears. The US conversion of the game reportedly has some improvements over the
original Famicom code, but I personally didn’t notice a big difference.
![]() |
![]() |
| Hyper Olympics (Track 'n Field) | Star Force |
Elevator
Action, released by Taito on June 28, 1985. Released in the US on August
1987
Like Track & Field, Elevator Action was another rather novel
game to hit the arcades. It just didn’t attract nearly as much attention.
Elevator Action probably offered you more ways to kill you opponents than most
other games at the time. You could shoot them, drop kick them, shoot a light so
it landed on their heads, or crush them with an elevator. The premise of the
game is simple. You start at the very top of a building, and you must descend to
the ground, picking up secret plans along the way, and dodging enemy fire. Your
primary method of descent is to use the elevators, although you will
occasionally be forced to rely on escalators positioned along the sides. Your
enemies can make use of these transports as well, and will come out of any door
available. They will shoot you on sight, but you can duck under, or jump over
the offending bullets. Secret plans can be found behind the red doors and can be
picked up for bonus points by standing in front of the door and pressing up. On
your way down the elevators, you can fire your gun so that you hit one of the
ceiling lamps, causing the light to fall to the ground, (possibly killing an
enemy,) and darken the building for a brief period of time, lowering your
enemies’ inclination to fire at you. By the time you reach the lower half of the
building, the elevator shafts form more of a maze for you to navigate until you
reach the basement parking lot where your get-away car is waiting. All in all,
it’s a fun game, a great port, and a recommended play.
Field
Combat, released by Jaleco on July 9, 1985
Field Combat is a game you
probably have never heard of. You probably didn’t know it was an arcade game
first either. That’s OK, because in my opinion, you haven’t missed anything.
Field Combat plays like a wanna-be strategy game. You control what looks like a
UFO with a giant rotating radar dish on top. You can fire missiles at your
enemies, or use an Galaga-like tractor beam on them which absorbs them in to
your UFO. Once you absorb an enemy, they join your ranks and can be summoned to
fight along with you by pressing both buttons simultaneously. Your goal is to
advance to the end of each stage and break through the enemies’ defenses. The
game grows in difficulty by throwing tougher and greater numbers of enemies at
your UFO, some of which can steal your troops back to their side. Your missile
range isn’t great, and typically puts you within enemy fire range in order for
you to hit them. At best, I would call it a neat idea with a flawed execution.
![]() |
![]() |
| Elevator Action | Field Combat |
Road
Fighter, released by Konami on July 11, 1985
While Road Fighter will
never be considered an A-class racing game, it is quite a fun simple racer that
includes some interesting twists on the game play. The game is played from a
bird’s eye view. You will always occupy the bottom space of the screen, giving
you a good amount of advanced warning of oncoming cars. You weave in and out of
the traffic as the road twists left and right, but always forward. You have two
speeds, running in low gear when holding B, and then switching to high gear with
A when your speed is high enough. As you progress, you must avoid all the
traffic with the exception of the four color cars that provide you with extra
fuel. The yellow cars and trailer trucks drive straight while the red and blue
cars will occasionally change lanes as they get closer to you, making them a bit
harder to predict and avoid. If you hit another car from the side, or run across
an oil slick, your car will begin to swerve. At that moment, you have a brief
chance to correct the problem by pushing the control pad IN TO the swerve, not
away which is what your instincts will tell you to do the first few times. If
you don’t correct your steering in time, watch your car spin out of control in
to the side of the road. Each level must be finished and a little map on the
left lets you know how close you are to the goal. Road Fighter was originally an
arcade game, and while the port sacrifices some detail and resolution, it’s a
great simple racing game that didn’t make it to the shelves stateside.
Warpman,
released by Namco on July 12, 1985
For Namco’s 7th Famicom release, they
decided to do something a little different. Rather than release a pixel accurate
port of one of their more successful arcade games, they developed an update to a
lesser known game called Warp Warp. Warpman is the spiritual successor to Warp
Warp, in that it updates the graphics quite a bit, but changes virtually none of
the game play. In Warpman, you control a character (who ironically looks quite a
bit like Dig Dug,) who must zap all the enemies that appear in the space around
him. Enemies of different speeds spiral around the outside of the stage,
eventually working inward, and all you have to do is avoid them and shoot them.
Occasionally, a bonus character will come along, trailing one of the letters E,
X, T, R, or A behind them. If you kill them and collect each of the letters, you
earn an extra life. Sounds simple, but it gets difficult the longer you play.
Additionally, the “galaxy” in the center of the stage lights up from time to
time, allowing you to “warp” to an alternate dimension where instead of shooting
the enemies, you must bomb them Bomberman style, and you are susceptible to your
own blasts. Why would you wish to enter this alternate realm? It is in this
realm that you can obtain a power up for you gun that allows you to fire
explosive blasts from your gun in the original dimension once you find the hatch
that allows you to return. Warpman is a game that looks overly simple at first,
but slowly reveals a lot more depth than you could originally perceive.
![]() |
![]() |
| Road Fighter | Warpman |
Zippy
Race, released by Irem on July 18, 1985
Now we’re down to a lower caliber
of game. When comparing Zippy Race to Road Fighter (reviewed above,) Zippy Race
looks like it has everything going for it. Clearer larger graphics, and you ride
a bike instead of a car like everyone else. Only when you start playing it does
it quickly lose all of its charm. It’s slow and clunky, and the splits in the
road leave very little margin for error. The enemy cars appear to try to cut you
off, but will freeze in to position once they get too close to you, so you can
dodge them easily unless you get pinned in by the curb. If you get stuck in one
lane and you’re not in high gear, a car will have no problem simply running you
over, but if you stay in high gear when the lane merges, you will most likely
crash. Even at top speed, it doesn’t really feel like you’re moving very
quickly. This game didn’t get released outside of Japan, and it’s easy to see
why.
Door Door,
released by Enix on July 18, 1985
From the company that would eventually
release the legendary Dragon Quest/Warrior series and ActRaiser comes… this.
Door Door was another MSX transplant to the Famicom, and it plays like a
straight port with no improvements. You are some sort of white blob that wears
an oversized baseball cap, and you are stuck in each stage with a set of odd
looking monsters. Your goal is to open some of the many doors scattered
throughout the stage, lure the monsters in without touching them, and shut the
door, locking them out of the stage. Once you manage to get every monster behind
a shut door, you advance to the next stage. You can jump over enemies or doors,
but if you ever fall more than the height of one ledge, you will die. The
graphics are large and simple, and the game play is plodding and slow. It might
serve as an interesting distraction for a good period of time, but the pace of
the game will be a grind to most players, and few will find they have the
patience to sit all the way through the first couple of stages. Only the curious
need examine this title.
![]() |
![]() |
| Zippy Race | Door Door |
| The Thrill Of Defeat: Commodore Plus/4 & Commodore 16 part 4 |
| by Mark Sabbatini |
Of all the machines in his collection, Mike Lee is devoting his new Web site to the humblest.
He acknowledges his Commodore 16 can't match his Commodore 128 (a beefed up Commodore 64) or Amiga 1200 in horsepower and overall gaming quality. He's even got the 16's big brother - a Commodore Plus/4 - but still finds himself gravitating toward the first machine he bought in a shop.
"I thought the games on the C64 was better mostly, simply because of the sprites and sound, but having said that there is something about the C16 games that I can't simply explain," he wrote in an e-mail. "I have seen a few C64 games that were terrible and on the C16 (conversion) was not bad at all."
The Commodore 16 is less crash-prone, has a better case and a more suitable keyboard layout for gaming than the Plus/4, added Lee, whose site is at http://commodore16.bravehost.com/. He bought his Plus/4 from eBay, but also is buying a 64K upgrade for his C16 and says he's likely to spend most of his time with latter machine when the memory arrives. At one time he owned pretty much every Sinclair Spectrum model in that long-evolving line, plus a truly meek ZX81 and something called the Oric Atmo, but "I just didn't have the room so something had to go."
Lee's opinion is shared by at least one other member of the user group at the http://www.commodore16.com/ Web site, which hosts a browser-based emulator and hundreds of games being reviewed here as part of this ongoing series about games on forgotten machines. A U.K. resident calling himself Sixteen Plus says, aside from a fail-prone power supply, a C16 with extra memory beats a Plus/4 any day. The Plus/4 comes with extras like built-in software for applications like word processing, but they are generally considered so lame they don't overcome the machine's deficiencies.
Preferences for "weaker" machines in a computer line are hardly uncommon, especially when the beefier version is partially or wholly incompatible. Nobody had much use for the Apple III. Atari's 5200 console and 1200 series computer contributed to the company's death. Tandy's Color Computer 3 might have been the most powerful eight-bit micro ever, but - and I say this as loyal CoCo fan - so what?
Some of the most famous games in history such as Manic Miner and its sequel Jet Set Willy are part of this month's capsule reviews, and the fact they are mostly as entertaining on "weaker" CPUs speaks volumes about the appeal of the basic concepts and devotion of the programmers doing the conversions (compared to, say, anything by Coleco on an Atari). Most of the games in this list are conversions from well-known Commodore and Sinclair hits, as is the case most of the time, but one original winner for the C16-Plus/4 series is near the end of the list.
Lee's favorite C16 games, by the way, are TimeSlip, Fireant and Commando. I was less enthusiastic, but I also like text adventures, which he says are his least favorite. This is why reviews like these should be taken with the proverbial grain of salt.
Indoor
Soccer (B)
The
indoor soccer I saw as a kid (the Colorado Avalanche, a name later hijacked by
Denver's hockey team) was something like today's arena football: small field,
high scoring, and rules generally aimed at fan-pleasing speed and excitement.
This game is a decent all-around soccer game, but as someone who doesn't play
them often I confess the "indoor" element is lost on me (there are no doubt
hoards of European gamers able to dissect the finer points better). One or two
players, three skill levels and the option of keyboard or joystick controls make
this a user-friendly game. Passing, fouls, penalty kicks and goalkeeping on the
scrolling playfield are all implemented well (even fights are possible depending
on the foul). Halfs are five minutes each, making for reasonable length matchs.
Graphics and speed are average, meaning unremarkable and a bit pokey.
Into The
Eagle's Nest (C+ on machine/D on emulator)
A Gauntlet-type game with some
deficiencies even overlooking a near-fatal emulation problem. It's a popular
game ported from the Commodore 64 and some other computers, with the player
shooting Nazis instead of monsters. There's four missions to complete instead of
dungeons. The ability to select one of them at the beginning of the game is a
nice plus. The game looks decent, but movement is screen-by-screen instead of
scrolling, a minus. Many of Gauntlet's better features are missing such as
multiple characters and players, and the game is considerably slower overall.
There's a lot of flicker and for some reason you can't see your shots when
they're fired. The biggest problem in the emulated version is the spacebar is
both the fire and pause key, so the game does a start-stop thing the entire
time. For those who scoff at emulators it's hard to find a better supporting
argument than this title.
The
Invincible (C-)
Combinations of popular games are common, but Contra
meets Breakout? Sometimes you're a macho dude in a scrolling maze shooting
things and sometimes you're a paddle knocking out bricks. It's strange blend,
but that'd be OK if the game itself were more playable. Screen flicker in
particular is awful and the controls, while passable, could be a lot better.
Jailbreak
(F)
An unplayable Breakout game. Has options for joystick or user-defined
keys, in-game instructions and decent graphics. But balls are launched quickly
from places the player cannot reach, even with blind luck, almost every time. A
victory after several games would be hitting the ball once, but even this minor
miracle proved impossible.
Jerry 1
and 2 (D/B-)
Skip the
first and go directly to the sequel if you want to try these rather weird
black-and-white platformers from Hungary. The player's character moves around
screens of ladders and platforms, picking up items and avoiding deadly
obstacles. It's more puzzle than real-time arcade action, but quick reflexes are
needed to cope with certain quirks. If you reach the top of a ladder, for
instance, it collapses under you and unless there's some secondary solution to
the screen you'll need to commit suicide and start over. Jerry 1 was unplayable
on the emulator because some of the controls don't seem to work, but Jerry 2 is
a better choice anyhow because of its slightly flashier presentation and larger
range of puzzle elements.
Jet Man
(Ding Bat) (C+)
This was reviewed as Ding Bat in part two of this series.
The summary: "Simple, high-speed single-screen shooter that's enjoyable for
short stretches of time. You control a guy with a jet-pack that shoots ships and
clouds while collecting power-ups...our hero seems to be working in a
hyper-gravity environment - he falls and accelerates really fast, making
precision movement without touching the ground a real trick."
Jet Set
Willy (A)
If you don't know what this game is you need to play it
immediately. For those familiar with it, nothing I write is likely to change
your opinion. This 60-platform explorer is among the top sellers in computer
game history and may be the most hacked game of the pre-Doom era. Remakes and
variations continue to be made for modern computers and handhelds, not to
mention endless emulation and tribute pages. All this for a sequel, albeit
another mega hit known as Manic Miner. The Plus/4 version seems faithful to the
Spectrum original, but I haven't checked out every last detail (something
diehards obviously will). Nothing noble about the plot: Miner Willy has to tidy
up his house after a party before his housekeeper allows him access to his
bedroom. Not only are there objects requiring cleaning up, but much of the house
is unexplored and full of nasty creatures. He can only move left, right and jump
(easy controls), but there's also ladders and ropes he can use with minimal
effort. One major quirk - if you die by falling too far, but that fall causes
you to drop onto a lower screen, you begin your next life at the spot of the
fall, resulting in an endless chain of unavoidable deaths. Be careful with this,
however, and there's lots of fun to keep most people busy for some time.
Karate
King (C)
This one-on-one Mortal Kombat beat-em-up is competent, but
unremarkable. One or two players fight using eight-way joysticks and fire
buttons to move, jump, kick and punch. The backgrounds change, but the pixilated
red and blue fighters don't. Matches end with three knockdowns of a player or
when the timer runs out. Beyond the monotony of the matches and opponents,
collision detection is a little suspect and the controls are sluggish to
respond.
King Of
Kings (F)
A potentially OK platformer, but the controls make it
unplayable as far as I can tell. You're supposed to navigate through screens
using left-right movement and a jump key, except there seems to be no way to
jump any way except straight up. So getting over the various obstacles can't be
done. Unfortunate, but this also looks like it's far from the best of these
titles, so no great sense of loss.
Labirinth
4 (B)
Easy to play maze/puzzle arcade game, where you collect money,
bombs and keys, avoiding nasties moving in repetitive patterns. Bombs blow away
some bricks that are in the way, while keys open doors. Every screen is a
real-time puzzle that never changes, but the difficulty level is appropriate and
it doesn't take long to get from one screen to the next. But with no save or
continue option, the appeal wanes the further you get into the game before
having to start over. The other problem is the game moves very quickly and it's
not easy to control your man precisely, so you'll die a lot because he couldn't
dodge into the door or corridor you were aiming for.
Lazer 900
(D+)
Lukewarm vertical space shooter that progresses through a
Centipede-like stage, Space Invaders-like stage and then some meteor dodging
before repeating itself. Your ship does only the left-right-fire thing. Graphics
are functional and speed is OK. But there's a huge problem here - there seems to
be no way to die on the first two stages. The centipede-like chain of balls
never reaches the bottom, merely restarting at the top of the screen, and the
invaders don't descend from their top position. Furthermore, neither shoot. I
understand not wanting to make a game too challenging, but this is a bit absurd
unless you've got tots you want to break in gently.
Liberator
(B)
Good overhead-view scrolling space shooter, sort of like Xevious
turned sideways. You navigate across enemy bases in space, dodging turret guns
that fire a lot of shots and taking out fuel tanks to keep your ship going.
Groups of enemy ships also attack in patterns, although they're not a major
nuisance once you figure their movements out. At the end of the wave you must
blast holes through moving reactor waves and take out the reactor. A lot of good
touches throughout, including requiring the player to only complete the reactor
stage instead of the entire wave if they die at that point. I wasn't a huge fan
of the only up-and-down movement and there's games like this with more variety,
but none of the faults are all that serious.
Lloyd Game
(C)
The high-tech version of those sliding number puzzles with numbers
between 1 and 15, also known as the Puzzle game early Mac owners couldn't wait
to delete from their desktops. This version isn't terribly flashy and the
control scheme takes a bit of getting used to, but it's passable. The feature I
like most, which others may hate, is having a time limit to complete the puzzle
by.
Locomotion
(A-)
I'm no model
train fan and it's possible I'm overrating this puzzle/arcade hybrid, but
there's a depth and challenge here that's addictive as long as you're willing to
read the instructions and take sufficient time to figure things out. You control
a locomotive on about 50 screens of tracks, collecting gold from various
locations and delivering it to the bank. Parts of the track are damaged and
require materials to be delivered by truck for repairs. There's also bandits
that steal gold, other engines to avoid collisions with and switch points to be
manipulated so the train doesn't derail. There's a lot of nice gameplay touches
like requiring time for the train to speed up and slow down. There's eight
levels of play, with the first four being more puzzle-oriented and the final
four presenting more of an arcade-pace challenge. It's not nearly as in-depth as
the Railroad Tycoon games and their ilk, but Locomotion is a predecessor worth
spending time with.
Logomaze
(B)
A maze puzzler that's a little like those marble-in-the-wood-maze
toys. The player is a circle that supposed to get from start to finish on
screens with blocks in various places, sort of like a Pengo playfield. Moving in
any direction doesn't stop until the character reaches a block or wall, so the
trick is figuring out how to use the barriers to stop you in the right places.
By the way, there are time and movement limits for each screen. It starts easy
and gets challenging after a few screens. It's fun in the way other
quick-thinking strategy games like Balderdash are, especially since a password
system lets you skip previously played screens. But it's also not top-end
excitement.
Manic
Miner (B+)
Way too much has been written about this all-time classic
platformer, which was basically part of the Mario world of its day (it was the
prequel to Jet Set Willy, reviewed earlier). Versions have been written for
dozens of platforms, including modern translations for cell phones and PC/Mac
computers. Originally written for the Sinclair Spectrum, it features 20 levels
(more or fewer on some other platforms) of gathering keys, avoiding various
patrolling creatures and navigating platform tricks like conveyor belts and
melting blocks. The move and jump controls are exceptionally simple - it's
figuring out the proper series of moves that allow you to get all the keys on a
level and exit through a portal before your air runs out that are the challenge.
The Plus/4 version is a mostly average port across the board - no immediate
enhancements or omissions come to mind, but that's without playing all of the
levels and comparing them to the original. It seems just a bit pokey in the
emulator, but it's unfair to assume the real thing is as well. Since nearly
every reviewer/user fell over themselves to praise this, I thought I'd include
one of the harsher assessments - which includes one of my irritations - from the
rather colorful gaming site Way Of The Rodent, which slams every aspect of the
original down to its flatulent sound effects: "The difficulty in Manic Miner is
implemented in the cheapest and crappiest way possible: by putting obstacles in
the player's way that you have to be at EXACTLY the correct pixel position to
jump over."
Mansion
Adventure 1 (F/Incomplete)
This text adventure is one of those clunkers
that gets shelved and never played again five minutes after booting it up for
the first time, with my intolerance for playing it at any length the only reason
it doesn't get a failing grade outright. You begin the adventure in a locked
room with an iron bar and a sheet of paper. The problem is the text interpreter
doesn't recognize either object - "read paper," "take bar," etc. result in "I
don't understand the noun" messages.
Mine Field
(C)
Yup, this is a port of the avoid-the-bombs puzzler Microsoft has been
including as part of Windows since the beginning of time. You move around a grid
of squares (15X10 in this version), trying to locate those that contain bombs
without actually touching them. Empty squares indicate how many bombs are
adjacent, so a little logic usually goes a long way. This differs from the
classic version in that squares are automatically exposed as you move, instead
of allowing the player to select which ones are uncovered. This means you must
be much more careful moving, lest you hit a wrong key accidentally and end the
game. Also, this version only gives the bomb count for the square you're in
instead of keeping numbers in squares as they're uncovered. Both changes deter
the enjoyment factor slightly, but it may be a better choice for most than
Minesweeper (see below), which has a playfield so large it's hard to complete a
game in one sitting. Of note: The simplicity is self-evident from the title
screen, where the programmer notes it's his first game.
Minesweeper
(C)
This version is perhaps a tad flashier due to a huge scrolling
minefield, but less enjoyable because you can't finish a game in a few minutes
and get back to work. This version is closer to the Windows game that
addicts/bores millions: move a market around with the arrow keys, press
<SPACE> to uncover tiles and a number showing how many bombs are in
adjacent tiles appears. Uncover a bomb and the game is over. Pressing the slash
key places a flag on a tile where you suspect a bomb is. Mark all the bombs
correctly and you win. It gets the same grade as Mine Field (above) for being
closer to the original's gameplay and, if you've never played any version, this
isn't a bad way to sample the experience.
Moon Buggy
(B-)
This Moon Patrol clone is just that in many ways, with graphics and
gameplay as close to the arcade version of this scrolling space shooter as one
is likely to find on this machine. But three problems hamper the enjoyment of
piloting a vehicle across the surface of the moon, jumping and shooting the
rocks and spaceships that get in way. First, the game is slow - maybe half that
of the coin-op. Second, it's far too difficult from the start (no indicator, by
the way, of beginner and expert courses). Finally, the controls are a bit off -
the left and right joystick movements control the rate of scrolling, not where
your buggy is, so you can't move to avoid shots descending from above. Also, the
fire button causes you to jump and shoot at the same time, not always what you
want to do. It's possible to do each separately using the keyboard to fire and
up control on the joystick to jump, but that option also seems less responsive.
A real shame, since a few minor tweaks would make this a long-term keeper.
Motor
Mania (C+)
This
Pole Position/Hang On replica gets an "A" for first impressions, with slick
presentation, great graphics, dead-on controls, nice 3D visual effects and a
seemingly well-designed set of tracks. You have a tight time limit to complete
tracks, but a supply of three motorcycles, so if you fail you don't have to
start the game from scratch. But the longer I played the lower its grade
dropped, until at the end I was ready to give it near-failing grades for
playability. The reason? It's far too easy, even for racing-game stiffs like
myself. There are no other cars on the tracks, which get more difficult for a
few waves, but stop doing so way too quickly. The controls are so precise your
motorcycle never slides out of control even at full speed in tight turns, making
crashes all but nonexistent unless you fall asleep at the wheel. I was ready for
a nap after reaching wave 25 on my first game with little effort and bikes to
spare. Instead I quit and am not likely to make a return trip anytime soon. The
grade is strictly for the first-rate polish.
Mr.
Puniverse (A-)
It's another room-by-room platformer, where you jump
around collecting and avoiding things - yet I kept playing longer than most. As
with many good titles there's nothing revolutionary - just excellent
implementation of lots of familiar elements. Enemies and fixed hazards do their
best to shoot or squash you as you try to get from one linked screen to the
next. There's no time element, but an energy meter limits aimless exploring. It
normally decreases while moving and recharges when the player stops, but the
tiles on some surfaces suck it dry rapidly, leaving virtually no time for wasted
movements. Even when you die because you're caught off-guard by the challenge of
a new room there's a feeling it can be conquered on the next try. And since the
program gives you plenty of men to start, a few sacrificial deaths aren't overly
stressful. Got a mention as one of the top games for the C16 and Plus/4 from a
users' group recently, with the mention it's apparently a title unique to the
machines.
Music Maze
(C-)
A bit of short-term fun that loses points for lack of depth and a
conceptual flaw that leaves too much to chance. You move around a scrolling
maze, only a small portion of which is visible at any given time, looking for
items and returning to the starting point before time runs out. The graphics are
nothing special, but adequate, and the controls and game speed are fine. Problem
is the time limit is short and finding items is more or less dependent on random
luck. Playing it once or twice is enjoyable, but there's no motivation to get
better.
| Game Over |
Once again it's time to sign off for another month. Again I apologize that this issue was so late. Hopefully this won't become a habit in the future. Join us again next month for another great issue of Retrogaming Times Monthly!
- Adam King, Chief Editor
Copyright © 2006 Adam King & Alan Hewston. All related copyrights and trademarks are acknowledged.